Cheh Chuan low, Author at Award-winning Creative Agency in Singapore | Salt Creatives Pte Ltd Award-winning Creative Agency in Singapore Wed, 02 Aug 2023 06:58:41 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://saltcreatives.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/cropped-fav-icon-32x32.png Cheh Chuan low, Author at Award-winning Creative Agency in Singapore | Salt Creatives Pte Ltd 32 32 X-ed: No more tweets https://saltcreatives.com/x-ed-no-more-tweets/#utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=x-ed-no-more-tweets Tue, 01 Aug 2023 08:26:41 +0000 https://saltcreatives.com/?p=22065 Elon Musk's surprising decision to rebrand Twitter as 'X' raises questions about his vision for a super app akin to WeChat. Critics question the rationale, fearing alienation of loyal users and advertisers. Yet, Musk's unconventional and influential persona may shape the outcome. Only time will reveal the impact of this daring move.

The post X-ed: No more tweets appeared first on Award-winning Creative Agency in Singapore | Salt Creatives Pte Ltd.

]]>

Cheh Chuan Low

1 Aug 2023

Quick overview: On 23 Jul 23, the iconic blue bird (Twitter) was killed by its equally iconic owner, Mr Elon Musk. He announced a shocking major rebranding exercise for Twitter that will basically wipe out whatever that were once associated with the Twitter brand: the company name, the logo, and effectively terms that Twitter users used endearingly such as ‘Tweet’ and ‘Retweeted’, etc. What could have driven Elon Musk to make such a drastic and abrupt decision? What would the impact be for the Twitter brand?

His reasons in brief include: the advertising revenue of Twitter remains nearly half of what it was after all the shake-ups following his buy over of the company. This leaves the company with a negative cashflow and heavy debt load. On top of that, his business intent in longer term is to turn Twitter or now called X into a super app that offers a wide range of services like WeChat in China and Gojek in Indonesia. With an aging group of Twitter loyalists on one hand and the need to attract new Gen Z users for the new super app on the other, he made an executive decision to abandon the old brand and to embrace the new for a new future.

Calculated risks or pure ego? The sudden abandonment of the Twitter brand with an estimated $4 billion brand value according to brand valuation consulting firm Brand Finance or $15 billion to $20 billion by Vanderbilt University is somewhat bewildering for many in the branding industry. According to Allen Adamson, co-founder of the marketing and brand consulting group Metaforce, it’s “completely irrational from a business and brand point of view,” and “To me, it’s going to go down in history as one of the fastest unwinding of a business and brand ever.” (Source: Quote is from an Article from Time ). The obvious question is whether this move would alienate Twitter’s loyal users and drive them and advertisers even further away. Or is Musk convinced that people will get over their initial disappointments and their habits would compel them to continue using X in spite of their unhappiness with the brand change. And along with the rebranding and new capabilities that X will be offering, they would help him capture younger, newer users.

Total abandonment or gradual change? Some may argue that it would have been easier for Twitter followers to accept if the brand change was a refresh with some elements of the original brand being retained. This is after all what major brands conventionally do. The key word we need to note is ‘conventionally’ because Mr Musk is the exact opposite of convention. And we need to recognise that Elon Musk himself is a high profile brand. The brand value of the companies under him thrive on his personal brand. He is an influencer CEO with 140 million followers on Twitter/X. He is known to be polarizing, controversial, and makes moves that few dared. In short, Elon Musk is the super anti-hero with an ‘anti-brand’ charisma. He is undoubtedly, the Deadpool of the business world. The conclusion would be straight forward if it was a decision made by someone less influential. But in this instance, we are speaking about Elon Musk and we can’t discount the Musk effect and his loyal fanbase. So, was it a right move or not? I guess only time will tell.

The post X-ed: No more tweets appeared first on Award-winning Creative Agency in Singapore | Salt Creatives Pte Ltd.

]]>
GENERATIVE AI: Creativity killer or enabler? https://saltcreatives.com/generative-ai-creativity-killer-or-enabler/#utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=generative-ai-creativity-killer-or-enabler Tue, 01 Aug 2023 07:22:26 +0000 https://saltcreatives.com/?p=22034 Generative AI's rise has divided the creative world. While some see it as a threat to originality, others embrace its unstoppable force. At Salt, we explore AI's potential to strengthen creative proposals, but also acknowledge the need to adapt and integrate to thrive in the evolving landscape.

The post GENERATIVE AI: Creativity killer or enabler? appeared first on Award-winning Creative Agency in Singapore | Salt Creatives Pte Ltd.

]]>

Cheh Chuan Low

1 Aug 2023

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is all the rage now and with the advancements in Generative AI, its proliferation into various fields has drawn mixed reactions. For the ‘Creative Purists’ (a term I coined), Generative AI kills creativity, originality and artistry. Read author and illustrator Rob Biddulph’s response, he said AI-generated art “is the exact opposite of what I believe art to be. Fundamentally, I have always felt that art is all about translating something that you feel internally into something that exists externally. Whatever form it takes, be it a sculpture, a piece of music, a piece of writing, a performance, or an image, true art is about the creative process much more than it’s about the final piece. And simply pressing a button to generate an image is not a creative process.” (Credit/Source: Article from The Guardian)

Generated using Leonardo Ai

But, would rejection change the fact that the disruption and further disruptions by AI will continue unabated. In the history of humankind, the technology train is rarely stopped by rejection of the technology. If the new technology offers significant benefits at a price point that encourages adoption, mass adoption is only a matter of time. And in this instance, I feel the AI revolution is one of these unstoppable forces. As a ‘Creative Pragmatists’ (a term I coined), resisting is a significantly poorer choice than harnessing such a powerful technology. Let’s be real, as creative professionals, we have always enjoyed the power and productivity that technology put in our hands. It enables us to create or realise ideas or concepts that were otherwise unachievable. The Lord of Rings or the Marvels franchise would not have been possible without Computer Generated Imagery (CGI). I guess this discomfort stems from the fact that this time round, it encroaches on the origination of ideas. Machine Learning has made this generation of AI too threatening.

Let’s be very open about this. While I am open to exploring the new possibilities Generative AI bring, I am also concerned about the negative consequences it may or have already resulted in. First off, the automation and productivity would result in a drastic reduction in the need for creative professionals in the creative industry. Effects that would taken us days to create can now be achieved in hours. Adaptation and transcreation of creative assets can now be automated easily. As an agency, we have seen executional level type of work evaporated in the past few years. Many large companies with regional offices have started adopting AI-driven technology that automates these processes and have taken these tasks inhouse replacing the agencies they used to rely on. These baseline work may not be the profit driver for agencies but they remain critical in covering the daily operational costs of the agency. In the longer run, it rids the lower level type of creative work, meaning to say roles such as junior designer, FA artists, etc. may become redundant. But many Creative Directors and Art Directors today began their training in these very humble roles. Agencies face the immense pressure to upskill, integrate these technologies into their creative offerings or face extinction.

Generated using Leonardo Ai

At Salt, we started experimenting with Generative AI technologies (MidJourney AI and Leonardo AI) in a few of our recent projects in the following areas. While both technologies still require further refinements, we were able to leverage both platforms to strengthen our creative proposals. In one recent project, we generated photorealistic female models in the specific ethnicity, age, poses that we require without any photo shoots. In a second instance, we used Adobe Firefly to apply special effects to an existing design to enhance the overall aesthetics. While we are still early on the Generative AI adoption journey, I am quite certain AI will become an important competitive advantage in the not so distant future.

The post GENERATIVE AI: Creativity killer or enabler? appeared first on Award-winning Creative Agency in Singapore | Salt Creatives Pte Ltd.

]]>